|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |
Aurora Egnald
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
0
   |
Posted - 2011.10.10 21:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
What we have going on here is the punsihment of the supercapital pilots espically supercarriers because they are too "versatile" and can defend themsleves. So CCP is bowing to the whishes of the isk poor pilots who cant afford a supercarrier themselves , or have been killed by one,so they whined until they got their way. It seems to me that of you spend billions of isk on a supercarrier it should have more capibility than a regular carrier. It should be able to field alot of drones and it shoudl be able to fend for itself. But noooooooo CCP bows to the will of the less fortunate and envious. Instead of buffing up the smaller ships they are going to harm the producers of eve by nerfing supercapitals. This is by far the worst idea in eve. Eve should be moving forward not backards. Dont nerf the supers but buff the regular caps and smaller ships. |
Aurora Egnald
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 21:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Aurora Egnald wrote:What we have going on here is GǪbalancing. It's a good thing for everyone involved.
So why we are it why dont we just empty everyones isk and then evenly divide it between the players.. Since your such a great fan of balancing!!!!!!
Once again punishing the producers of eve at the behest of the isk poor and the envious. |
Aurora Egnald
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 21:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Aurora Egnald wrote:So why we are it why dont we just empty everyones isk and then evenly divide it between the players.. Since your such a great fan of balancing!!!!!! One has nothing to do with the other. Quote:Once again punishing the producers of eve at the behest of the isk poor and the envious. No.
Actually it is the same principle. You spend billions of isk on a ship and have just limited its capability and usefulness by half. Therefore taking half of the value out of it. balancing is just that. Taking isk form someones wallet and puttign it somewhere else.. Once again punishing the producers of eve at the behest of the poor and envious. All they needed to do was to make the smaller ships more capable not nerf the supers. |
Aurora Egnald
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 03:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
This is all about screwing the high skill pilots over period. Apperantly CCP is now practicing in game welfare in favor of the lower skilled/isk poor pilots. Looks like thay are really tryin to ruin this game in favor of their newest product world of darkness that caters to the twilight crowd. |
Aurora Egnald
Doomheim
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 16:32:00 -
[5] - Quote
The whoe "Balancing" could be solved by keeping the supers ability to launch regualr drones and buffing dreads in ehp,resists, cap and reducing the cap/cpu of capital turrets on dreads therefore returning dreads to viable capital killer letting the dreads get back into the game more effectively. Instead of screwing the sc pilots at the behest of the poor and envious. |
Aurora Egnald
Doomheim
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 20:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Velin Dhal wrote:Your acting like Super Caps are ruining this game. GǪand they are, since we've arrived at a situation where the answer is increasingly GÇ£more capsGÇ¥. The mere fact that those who are clinging to their SCs right now all spout some form of GÇ£so get one yourselfGÇ¥ is the ultimate example of why they need to be fixed: because that should never be the answer GÇö the answer should always be to get something completely different that acts as a hard counter for the ship.
Once again more ship envy." I dont like that you have the capabilites that you do and im unwilling to train up for it myself so please CCP come and punish those who have traind for it"
CCP =SC nerf for the poor,low skilled, and envious |
Aurora Egnald
Doomheim
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 20:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
Velin Dhal wrote:Tippia wrote:Velin Dhal wrote:Oh I think I see now. There you go again, not knowing anything about supercaps and basic mechanics. I know plenty about it. I also know that not a single one of your posts that I've seen, would have a benefit to anyone other than low SP toons. This has nothing to do about mechanics at this point as you have yet to state anything about mechanics other than the fact that your upset because of N+1 SC. So if you truly want to talk mechanics, then talk mechanics. Don't keep posting about your misguided opinion that the only logical way to counter super caps is with super caps. Its not.
Exactly. This whole super cap nerf is about ship envy. |
Aurora Egnald
Doomheim
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 20:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
Andreus Ixiris wrote:Aurora Egnald wrote:Exactly. This whole super cap nerf is about ship envy. Post with your supercarrier-capable main and then we can talk about ship envy.
Dont need to , thats why I have an alt.Posting under my alt does not take anyhting from what I have said. This is about the poor and lower skilled pilots unwilling to train up for a SC. Then crying loud enough to ccp to do something about it because they are way to scared to venture out to null without someone holding their hands or locking up the boogyman. |
Aurora Egnald
Doomheim
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 22:03:00 -
[9] - Quote
Andreus Ixiris wrote:Aurora Egnald wrote:Dont need to , thats why I have an alt. Anything I want to say, I say with my main. What are you afraid of? Aurora Egnald wrote:Posting under my alt does not take anyhting form what I have said. Except it does. There's always the implication therein that you don't have the spine to say with your main what you can say without hesitation on your alt. It basically puts across that you're ashamed of your ideas and opinions being associated with your main. Aurora Egnald wrote:This is about the poor and lower skilled pilots unwilling to train up for a SC. Then crying loud enough to ccp to do something about it because they are way to scared to venture out to null without someone holding ther hands or locking up the boogyman. I have in excess of 80m skillpoints and have the prerequisites to fly the supercarriers of two races. With a little bit of instruction I'd likely be able to fly one competently in combat. I have absolutely no desire to because I have no desire to shackle my soul to a several-billion dollar flying rock that will, inevitably, without a shadow of a doubt, die. From what I've seen of 0.0 combat, it was a lot more fun before motherships became supercarriers.
wow so taking a little security with my sc flying main diminishes what ive said huh? Seems it hasnt and your attempts to call me out have failed. Its called security.But since you admittedly dont fly one you dont unserstand the security required of an sc pilot identity as well. Again i stand by my point earlier this whole nerf is aobut the lower skilled/poor/unwilling/envious pilots who would rather not try and reach the status of sc pilot either because it takes too long or is too expensive but they darn sure want to kill one alot easier. |
Aurora Egnald
Doomheim
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 23:30:00 -
[10] - Quote
[quote=Demon AzrakelIf it is a security issue and you are afraid of a SC pilot getting searched for by locators, you must not appear on any killmails (otherwise your name is already out there). If you do not appear on any killmails, then you do not actually know what you are saying, and are talking out of your ass.[/quote]
Again I said earlier buff the dreads leave the supercarriers alone. Too bad you dont like me posting through an alt.. I still stand by what I posted earlier. This whole sc "balancing" benefits the lower skilled players at the expense of the people who have invested in sc's, both the builders and pilots of them. |
|
|
Aurora Egnald
Doomheim
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 00:16:00 -
[11] - Quote
Andreus Ixiris wrote:Aurora Egnald wrote:wow so taking a little security with my sc flying main diminishes what ive said huh? Seems it hasnt and your attempts to call me out have failed. Its called security.But since you admittedly dont fly one you dont unserstand the security required of an sc pilot identity as well. It doesn't change the fact that any opinion you can't stand behind with your main is an opinion that has no real support behind it. Just because you don't support a supercap nerf doesn't neccessarily mean you're a supercap pilot. Are you seriously egotistical enough to think that of the thousands of people who've posted in this thread, they're going to scrape every name and run a locator agent just to see if they're in space in a nullsec system? No-one in this thread even knew your main was a supercarrier pilot until you told us. Nice job on that. Callout successfully made. Aurora Egnald wrote:Again i stand by my point earlier this whole nerf is aobut the lower skilled/poor/unwilling/envious pilots who would rather not try and reach the status of sc pilot either because it takes too long or is too expensive but they darn sure want to kill one alot easier. I'm a high-skilled player who thinks being a supercap pilot would be boring, and I think supercaps are imbalanced in their current state. Sucks for you that however much you whine, this nerf will be made and there's not much you can do about it.
well touche on that one I thought it was obvious by the way I was defending sc's. Still already parts of the nerf have been scaled back(Fighter tracking) according to the devs and hopefully they will listen to reason on removing drones from sc's as well .Limiting an sc's ability to deploy regular drones is akin to making a domi only able to fly heavy drones. One poster said it quite well about the 900 mil carrier being able to defend itself form smaller ships while the 18 bil mothership cant. me thinks the devs went overboard with the full intention of scaling it back just to say see we didnt totally screw the sc pilots.Wink Wink |
|
|
| |
|